Latest News

Britain may be wasting nearly 3 billion pounds on COVID gear

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A delivery man wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) carries a box in front of ambulances, as the spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) continues, at the Royal London Hospital in London, Britain, January 19, 2021. REUTERS/Hannah M

By Alistair Smout

LONDON (Reuters) – Britain may be wasting nearly 3 billion pounds ($3.94 billion) on contracts for COVID-19 gear that have not given value for money, with millions spent each month storing unneeded and sometimes out-of-date kit, a watchdog said on Wednesday.

The report by the parliament-supervised National Audit Office (NAO) will fuel opposition claims that Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s government was wasteful and nepotistic in its allocation of huge contracts during the two-year pandemic.

But the health ministry, which handles the personal protective equipment (PPE) supplies, said it had been prudent to have too much rather than too little given the emergency.

According to the NAO, the ministry had identified 3.6 billion items unsuitable for front line use, the government spent over 700 million pounds on storage alone by November 2021, and 1.5 billion PPE items were estimated to be past expiry date.

“The (health) Department is continuing to manage 176 contracts where it believes it may not achieve full value for money, with an estimated 2.7 billion pounds at risk,” said NAO chief Gareth Davies.


Johnson has said he is proud of what the government did to secure PPE, and the health ministry said it had delivered 19.1 billion items of PPE to keep frontline staff safe.

“Having too much PPE was preferable to having too little in the face of an unpredictable and dangerous virus,” a Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) spokesperson said.

Britain has reported over 160,000 deaths from COVID-19.

The DHSC spokesperson added that where contracts were in dispute, it was seeking to recover costs from suppliers.

The chair of the parliamentary Committee of Public Accounts Meg Hillier said that the public might run out of patience with ongoing costs, such as the continued 7 million pounds a month spend on storing unneeded PPE cited by the NAO.

“Whatever forbearance the taxpayer may have had at the start of the pandemic, this will quickly wear thin if DHSC can’t now manage the consequences,” she said.

NAO analysis of the policy to fast-track some contracts found that of those so-called “VIP lane” suppliers, 53% provided some unsuitable PPE.

($1 = 0.7612 pounds)

Britain may be wasting nearly 3 billion pounds on COVID gear

Disclaimer:Fusion Mediawould like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.

What's your reaction?

In Love
Not Sure

You may also like

More in:Latest News

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *